The most expensive square meter in Brazil does not guarantee the best investment

The Brazilian residential real estate market closed 2025 with an appreciation of 6.52%, the second-highest increase in the last eleven years, surpassed only by the 7.73% growth recorded in 2024, and above the official inflation measured by the IPCA in the same period (Revista Fórum, 2026). The top of the price-per-square-meter ranking remains concentrated in the Rio-São Paulo axis, with Leblon and Ipanema in the lead, followed by Itaim Bibi, Pinheiros, and Savassi (Revista Fórum, 2026). Outside this axis, coastal markets such as Balneário Camboriú, Itapema, and Vitória appreciated well above the national average, consolidating themselves as "premium" markets on the radar of those looking for high-end properties (Forbes, 2026).

For a family with significant assets, this type of data requires caution before drawing any conclusions. Price per square meter measures address prestige and the pace of nominal appreciation. It does not measure whether the property produces a return compatible with the invested capital, whether it can be converted into cash when the family needs liquidity, or how much it costs to maintain over the years. These are three different questions, and only the first one appears in the rankings that circulate in the press.

‍

Real return weighs more than list price

List price appreciation and real return rarely tell the same story. According to the FipeZAP Index, the average residential rental yield in Brazil closed 2025 at 5.96% per year, a rate that remained below the average projected yield for benchmark financial investments in the same period (FipeZAP Residential Rental Index, December 2025). In other words, even a well-located property, rented out without vacancy, may return less than an investment with comparable risk, before any deductions for maintenance, condo fees, property taxes, and income tax on the rent received.

The situation worsens when the high-end property is not rented out, but rather reserved for the family's occasional use. In these cases, the opportunity cost of the immobilized capital is added to the maintenance of an asset that remains closed most of the year, and the appreciation on paper is only realized on the day the family finds a buyer willing to pay the expected price, within a timeframe that also does not appear in any market index.

Evaluating a property using the same criteria applied to any other investment avoids this type of surprise. Real return, liquidity, and maintenance costs should weigh just as much as the address when deciding whether to keep, buy, or sell an asset.

‍

The cost of transferring wealth

Every property involves two moments of taxation:

• Upon purchase, the ITBI applies, a municipal tax that generally ranges between 2% and 5% of the transaction value, depending on the city (Exame, 2025).
• Inheritance or gift transfers are subject to ITCMD, a state tax that can reach 8%, with a 4% rate in the state of São Paulo (26th Notary Office of São Paulo, 2025).

These two moments are added to the recurring cost of maintaining the asset. Property taxes, condo fees, and maintenance weigh on a property that generates neither income nor frequent use. In this scenario, the asset stops functioning as a store of value and begins to operate as a liability.

The ITCMD, in particular, is usually the most underestimated part of the bill. Families who keep property in their personal names, without any succession structure, transfer this cost entirely to their heirs at the time of death, when probate is already underway and there is no longer room for planning. A family holding company, for example, allows for the donation of shares during one's lifetime and reduces the base on which the tax is levied, one of the points we have already detailed in the article on generational wealth succession.

‍

The criteria for deciding if a property adds to your wealth

Four objective criteria determine whether a property contributes to a family's wealth or compromises it.

• Return. The income generated, whether through rent or appreciation net of costs and taxes, is compatible with the capital invested in the asset.
• Liquidity. The property can be converted into cash within a reasonable timeframe, should the family need resources for another purpose.
• Maintenance cost. The cost of maintaining the asset is known, budgeted, and sustainable over time, rather than a recurring surprise in the family's cash flow.
• Ownership structure. The way the property is registered facilitates, rather than complicates, its transfer during succession. This usually involves deciding between keeping the asset in a personal name or within a corporate structure, a choice we discuss in more detail in the article on investment and succession structures in estate planning.

Families who evaluate a property using these criteria before purchasing, and periodically revisit that assessment, treat the asset as part of a coherent wealth allocation. This is the exercise Jera Capital applies to every property within a client's portfolio. Other families only discover the true cost of the asset when they need to sell it, divide it among heirs, or pay transfer taxes.

Investors should measure each property by the same criteria applied to any other asset in the family portfolio.

‍

Read also

• Understand how the Multi-Family Office model optimizes wealth management for high-net-worth investors
• Tax Harvesting: the tax strategy that Brazilian families are not yet using
• Tax residency, citizenship, moving abroad: how to include them in estate planning

Want to understand if the properties in your portfolio add value or weigh it down? Speak with Jera Capital.

‍